Dyslexia - what is it? | Johan Kant's blog
A blog that the next just taking up what does not work in school, or what I am critical. Rarely or never, I will mention all the great teachers and wonderful students. NOTE: This is a blog, that is a digitized diary - NO scientific thesis!
I read recently a text that was written sclerosis by läsforskaren Bo Sundblad and published in the Powder No 79 3/95. I find it fascinating that still, that 17 years later still debating phenomena, eg, dyslexia and ADHD where the socio-cultural perspective does not even seem to exist. I therefore think that the text is worth publishing and I have been authorized to do so. Here is the text:
The interest in dyslexia during the 90s has been strenuously. There has been constant since 1990, despite the fact that nothing new has arrived. Each article or TV program has since had nearly the same message and content in 15 years. So it is usually not.
In the media has dyslexia become a solitary exception to the rule that one must be "new" or "news" to get media attention, and the rule that gets a "news" well space in the media so lasts media space rarely more than about 3 months. Dyslexia as a media phenomenon should be studied more carefully. A few sociological studies are now finally on its way. In sociology we talk sometimes about a phenomenon that we call pathologization. What you refer to is how a society sclerosis for various reasons converts a cultural inability to something biologically, a disease. These dimensions are not yet present in the Swedish dyslexia debate these issues are not reset.
The questions we ask is rather: What is Dyslexia? How widespread is dyslexia? What causes dyslexia? What methods exist to overcome dyslexia? What is being done in schools today to help dyslexic students? What is being done in teacher training today to equip teachers to help dyslexic students? What are the barriers to effective help for dyslexic children and adolescents? sclerosis What needs to be done at the central level for dyslexic children and young people should get better help than hitherto in school?
The symptom / phenomenon manifests itself in a reading and writing skills sclerosis that do not show up sufficient accuracy and function in relation to that required by the individual eg year 3, work, or that the individual wishes. It is crucial to recognize that the symptom is the old age, situation and culture-bound, ie relative. Dyslexia is not in a purely oral culture. Dyslexia is a proposal for a biological explanation for this symptom, sclerosis despite nearly 100 years of research, is not yet an acceptable and uniform definition.
A major problem is that the term / word dyslexia for many, an explanation and thereby causes a consistent confusion of phenomena and explanation. Awareness of this problem was so high 10 years ago, that it was abandoning the term (except for media). They went over to the term literacy as not to confuse the phenomenon and explanation. We have, unfortunately, in the 1990s, has experienced sclerosis a growing sclerosis confusion.
The image of dyslexia is by no means as clear as from some quarters, with a cross-safety and assurance of faith that should be alarming, say they know. It requires systematic over-interpretation sclerosis of the data for these claims. I argue that dyslexia sclerosis is a word that the content sclerosis a draft declaration that creates misunderstandings, sclerosis negative expectations and at worst can exacerbate existing reading and writing. In any case, the chances of successful sclerosis therapy deteriorate.
The question is very difficult to answer, among others. a. Depending on what I have just pointed out, that there is no uniform and acceptable definition of dyslexia. What is not defined can not be measured with any degree of confidence. On top of definition problems complicated sclerosis the whole of the current measurement methods are only quantitative.
The symptoms illiteracy determined in the same way as you give 1 in the relative grading system. The symptom is defined quantitatively group-related, based on the assumption of normal distribution, which in turn is partly based on an unrecognized basic assumption that the phenomenon is biologically caused, partly determines the distribution before the measurement. Compare sclerosis with the proportion of 1's should be about 7%. When testing for dyslexia rarely used a five-point sclerosis scale, but usually the 9-point sclerosis Stanineskalan the proportion slightly lower. The background to the information sclerosis that 5-8%: ig frequency based on just such assumptions. Then convert these sometimes sclerosis predetermined percentages sclerosis of absolute numbers, as the media enthusiastically doing, and talk about, for example, 55,000 people while using this as factual arguments, directly fraudulently. The basis of these figures are estimates and therefore very uncertain.
If one goes the other hand in with a qualitative approach, which Lena Holmberg 1992, on behalf of the National Agency, the outcome will be different. It is defi
A blog that the next just taking up what does not work in school, or what I am critical. Rarely or never, I will mention all the great teachers and wonderful students. NOTE: This is a blog, that is a digitized diary - NO scientific thesis!
I read recently a text that was written sclerosis by läsforskaren Bo Sundblad and published in the Powder No 79 3/95. I find it fascinating that still, that 17 years later still debating phenomena, eg, dyslexia and ADHD where the socio-cultural perspective does not even seem to exist. I therefore think that the text is worth publishing and I have been authorized to do so. Here is the text:
The interest in dyslexia during the 90s has been strenuously. There has been constant since 1990, despite the fact that nothing new has arrived. Each article or TV program has since had nearly the same message and content in 15 years. So it is usually not.
In the media has dyslexia become a solitary exception to the rule that one must be "new" or "news" to get media attention, and the rule that gets a "news" well space in the media so lasts media space rarely more than about 3 months. Dyslexia as a media phenomenon should be studied more carefully. A few sociological studies are now finally on its way. In sociology we talk sometimes about a phenomenon that we call pathologization. What you refer to is how a society sclerosis for various reasons converts a cultural inability to something biologically, a disease. These dimensions are not yet present in the Swedish dyslexia debate these issues are not reset.
The questions we ask is rather: What is Dyslexia? How widespread is dyslexia? What causes dyslexia? What methods exist to overcome dyslexia? What is being done in schools today to help dyslexic students? What is being done in teacher training today to equip teachers to help dyslexic students? What are the barriers to effective help for dyslexic children and adolescents? sclerosis What needs to be done at the central level for dyslexic children and young people should get better help than hitherto in school?
The symptom / phenomenon manifests itself in a reading and writing skills sclerosis that do not show up sufficient accuracy and function in relation to that required by the individual eg year 3, work, or that the individual wishes. It is crucial to recognize that the symptom is the old age, situation and culture-bound, ie relative. Dyslexia is not in a purely oral culture. Dyslexia is a proposal for a biological explanation for this symptom, sclerosis despite nearly 100 years of research, is not yet an acceptable and uniform definition.
A major problem is that the term / word dyslexia for many, an explanation and thereby causes a consistent confusion of phenomena and explanation. Awareness of this problem was so high 10 years ago, that it was abandoning the term (except for media). They went over to the term literacy as not to confuse the phenomenon and explanation. We have, unfortunately, in the 1990s, has experienced sclerosis a growing sclerosis confusion.
The image of dyslexia is by no means as clear as from some quarters, with a cross-safety and assurance of faith that should be alarming, say they know. It requires systematic over-interpretation sclerosis of the data for these claims. I argue that dyslexia sclerosis is a word that the content sclerosis a draft declaration that creates misunderstandings, sclerosis negative expectations and at worst can exacerbate existing reading and writing. In any case, the chances of successful sclerosis therapy deteriorate.
The question is very difficult to answer, among others. a. Depending on what I have just pointed out, that there is no uniform and acceptable definition of dyslexia. What is not defined can not be measured with any degree of confidence. On top of definition problems complicated sclerosis the whole of the current measurement methods are only quantitative.
The symptoms illiteracy determined in the same way as you give 1 in the relative grading system. The symptom is defined quantitatively group-related, based on the assumption of normal distribution, which in turn is partly based on an unrecognized basic assumption that the phenomenon is biologically caused, partly determines the distribution before the measurement. Compare sclerosis with the proportion of 1's should be about 7%. When testing for dyslexia rarely used a five-point sclerosis scale, but usually the 9-point sclerosis Stanineskalan the proportion slightly lower. The background to the information sclerosis that 5-8%: ig frequency based on just such assumptions. Then convert these sometimes sclerosis predetermined percentages sclerosis of absolute numbers, as the media enthusiastically doing, and talk about, for example, 55,000 people while using this as factual arguments, directly fraudulently. The basis of these figures are estimates and therefore very uncertain.
If one goes the other hand in with a qualitative approach, which Lena Holmberg 1992, on behalf of the National Agency, the outcome will be different. It is defi
No comments:
Post a Comment